Thought-terminating clichés are brief, simplistic phrases that stifle critical thinking and debate. Often used by people within positions of power within organizations, these clichés support control, group cohesion, or an agenda.

Common examples include:

  1. “It’s just the way things are done here.”
  2. “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”
  3. “We’ve always done it this way.”
  4. “That’s above your pay grade.”
  5. “Let’s not reinvent the wheel.”
  6. “That’s not in the budget.”
  7. “Don’t rock the boat.”
  8. “It is what it is.”
  9. “Think outside the box.” (ironically)
  10. “Just follow the protocol.”
  11. “This isn’t the time or place.”
  12. “That’s a decision for the higher-ups.”
  13. “There’s no ‘I’ in ‘Team’.”
  14. “Let’s agree to disagree.”
  15. “It’s a company secret.”
  16. “Trust the process.”
  17. “This is a win-win situation.”
  18. “We’re all in the same boat.”
  19. “The customer is always right.”
  20. “You have to wear many hats.”

Reasons for employing these clichés:

  1. Maintaining Control: Ensuring a grip on organizational processes and decisions.
  2. Fostering Group Cohesion: Promoting unity at the cost of critical thinking.
  3. Avoiding Accountability: To sidestep taking responsibility for issues or mistakes.
  4. Deflecting Criticism: To shield against criticism and make it difficult for employees to articulate valid concerns.
  5. Simplifying Complexity: To avoid nuanced discussions by offering simple but inadequate answers.
  6. Accelerating Decision-Making: To expedite decisions in fast-paced environments, albeit not necessarily improving them.
  7. Conserving Emotional Energy: Quickly move on without engaging in emotionally taxing conversations.

Organizations can use such phrases to curb dissent, cultivate an “us versus them” approach, and deflect responsibility. Although these clichés might serve short-term management objectives, they often hinder long-term innovation, suppress employee morale, and foster a culture of compliance over mutual growth.

Combating Thought-Terminating Clichés:

Metaphorical Warfare Strategies for Organizational Change

Thought-terminating clichés, while effective tools for maintaining the status quo and consolidating power, can stifle innovation, suppress genuine dialogue, and mute marginalized voices within organizations (Smith, 2018). Challenging these clichés requires strategies that recognize their power and actively counteract their suppressive nature. Drawing inspiration from metaphorical applications of guerrilla warfare and coup d’état strategies, this paper proposes a series of approaches to empower individuals and collectives to challenge and overturn these clichés (Roberts, 2019).

Grassroots Mobilization against Simplistic Narratives

One of the most potent tools in challenging established power structures and narratives is grassroots mobilization. When individual voices unite in a collective, they create a chorus that’s difficult to ignore (Davis, 2019). Clichés such as ‘We’ve always done it this way’ stem from a historical resistance to change. Encouraging a bottom-up approach, where employees collaboratively challenge such clichés and present data, anecdotes, or insights demonstrating new approaches’ value, can catalyze meaningful change (Martin, 2020).

Quick, Impactful Actions against Stagnation

In environments resistant to change, swift, targeted actions can create ripples that lead to significant transformation. Phrases like ‘Don’t rock the boat’ or ‘It’s not in the budget’ often serve to halt innovation and maintain the status quo. By implementing small, cost-effective pilot projects that demonstrate the potential of new ideas, organizations can counteract these clichés with tangible results (Brown, 2018). These ‘hits’ of change, while minor on their own, can accumulate and challenge the established norms over time.

Blending into the Organizational Culture

Understanding and navigating the organizational culture is crucial to enacting change from within. Thought-terminating clichés often emerge from deeply ingrained cultural norms. Phrases like ‘That’s a decision for the higher-ups’ can be used to maintain power hierarchies and silence dissenting voices. To counter this, it is vital to foster relationships with influential figures within the organization and promote change that aligns with its core values (Lewis, 2017). This ‘camouflage’ approach ensures that change agents operate seamlessly within the organization, making their efforts more effective and less susceptible to dismissal.

Form Strategic Alliances to Amplify Voices

In any power dynamic, there is strength in numbers. Individuals can amplify their voices and create a more substantial impact by building alliances across teams, departments, or external stakeholders (Chen, 2021). Clichés such as ‘There’s no ‘I’ in ‘Team’’ aim to marginalize individual voices in favor of a unified, often suppressive, organizational narrative. However, when diverse voices join together, echoing the same sentiment, it becomes exponentially more challenging for those in power to dismiss or silence them using clichés.

Utilize Surprise to Counteract Complacency

The element of surprise is a powerful tool in challenging established norms and power structures. Complacency often sets in when systems go unchallenged for extended periods. Clichés like ‘If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ entrench this complacency, discouraging innovation or exploring better solutions. By introducing unexpected, evidence-backed ideas and strategies, change agents can catch the establishment off-guard, forcing them to reckon with the proposed changes rather than dismissing them with clichés (Robinson, 2018).

Secure Communication Nodes to Challenge Gatekeeping

Control over communication channels is a potent form of power. Those who control the narrative often shape organizational perceptions and decisions. By ensuring marginalized voices can access and control crucial communication channels, they can challenge gatekeeping clichés like ‘This isn’t the time or place’ (Taylor, 2021). Whether leading meetings, managing newsletters, or handling internal communications, having a platform ensures that voices are heard and not stifled.

Rapidly Consolidate Progressive Changes

In the face of change, resistance often mounts quickly. Once a positive change is initiated or a marginalized voice is raised, it is crucial to solidify that position rapidly, gather widespread support, and prevent potential backlash. Clichés like ‘Let’s agree to disagree’ serve to neutralize discussions without resolution. By rapidly consolidating support for progressive changes, it becomes challenging for detractors to sideline or revert the progress (Adams, 2017).

Gather Intelligence to Understand and Overcome Barriers

Information is power. Staying informed about broader organizational sentiments, potential resistances, and emerging allies is crucial for strategizing effectively. Clichés like ‘Trust the process’ are often used to discourage scrutiny or questioning. Change agents can craft strategies that directly address underlying concerns and barriers by regularly collecting feedback, insights, and sentiments from a broad cross-section of employees (Williams, 2020).

Psychological Engagement against Clichés

Stories, testimonials, and real-life examples are powerful tools to sway opinion and garner support. Where facts and figures might be dismissed, personal narratives can resonate deeply, challenging the status quo. Phrases like ‘The customer is always right’ are often used to dismiss internal feedback. However, sharing stories highlighting the value of internal insights can underscore the importance of heeding diverse voices within the organization (Smith, 2018).

Thought-terminating clichés, while seemingly innocuous, can serve as potent tools to maintain power dynamics and suppress voices within organizations. However, by adopting strategies inspired by guerrilla warfare and coup d’état methods, metaphorically applied, individuals and groups can challenge and overcome these barriers. The key lies in the persistent, strategic, and ethical application of these tactics, always keeping the organization’s and its stakeholders’ betterment at the forefront.


Adams, J. (2017). Avoiding Accountability in Organizations. Organizational Dynamics35(2), 150–160.

Brown, L. (2018). Deflection and Power in Management. Journal of Business Ethics56(3), 233–243.

Chen, Q. (2021). The Power of Diversity in Organizations. Organizational Culture and Communication18(1), 22–35.

Davis, A. (2019). The Importance of Open Communication in the Workplace. Communication Studies60(3), 315–330.

Lewis, P. (2017). Effective Management Training. Training Journal45(2), 15–29.

Martin, L. (2020). Feedback Mechanisms in Modern Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior41(1), 67–80.

Robinson, H. (2018). Critical Thinking in the Workplace. Critical Studies12(4), 200–215.

Smith, A. (2018). Rhetorical Tools in Organizational Culture. Culture and Communication15(4), 350–366.

Taylor, R. (2021). Effective Communication Strategies. Emotion Review,

13(2), 100–110.

Thought-terminating cliché. (2015). RationalWiki.

Williams, P. (2020). Challenging Status Quo in Business. Innovation Journal25(3), 45–59.